Skip to main content
Vantaige

Legal & Licensing Guide

Open Source vs. Open Weights in Artificial Intelligence

The legal and practical distinctions between genuine Open Source software and Open-Weight models with commercial restrictions, usage limits, and distillation clauses.

Top Open Weights & Open Source Models License Comparison

Compare commercial use, user caps, synthetic data rules, and OSI compliance at a glance.

Model & PublisherLicense NameCommercial UseUser Cap / LimitsDataset Released?Train Competing Models?
DeepSeek-V3 / R1
DeepSeek AI
MIT License
Permissive License
Full Commercial

Completely permissive. No user threshold or synthetic data restrictions.

No user limit Private Allowed
Llama 3.1 / 3.2 / 3.3
Meta AI
Llama 3.3 Community License
Custom Open Weights
Conditional

Free for standard business, but cannot use outputs to train non-Llama models.

> 700M monthly active users requires custom license Private Restricted
Llama 4 Scout / Maverick
Meta AI
Llama 4 Community License
Custom Open Weights
Conditional

MoE multimodal models. Same community license structure as Llama 3 — no output-based training of competing models.

> 700M MAU requires Meta's separate commercial agreement Private Restricted
Meta Muse Glimmer 30B
Meta Superintelligence Labs
Apache 2.0
Permissive License
Full Commercial

Full Apache 2.0. Distilled from Muse Spark — no use restrictions beyond the open license.

No user limit Private Allowed
Qwen3 (0.6B to 32B dense)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Apache 2.0
Permissive License
Full Commercial

All dense Qwen3 sizes are Apache 2.0. Full commercial freedom including fine-tuning and redistribution.

No user limit Private Allowed
Qwen3 235B-A22B (MoE)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Apache 2.0
Permissive License
Full Commercial

Apache 2.0. MoE flagship. 22B active params. Requires >100M MAU to be reviewed by Alibaba for certain commercial uses.

Notify Alibaba Cloud for deployments >100M MAU Private Allowed
Qwen 2.5 (0.5B to 72B)
Alibaba Cloud
Apache 2.0 (most sizes) / Tongyi
Permissive License
Full Commercial

Apache 2.0 for 0.5B to 32B models. Full commercial freedom.

> 100M MAU for certain 72B variants Private Allowed
OLMo 2 (7B / 13B)
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Apache 2.0 (Code, Weights & Dolma Data)
Permissive License
Full Commercial

100% OSI-compliant Open Source AI: weights, code, and full Dolma dataset released.

No user limit Full Data (Dolma) Allowed
Gemma 3 (4B / 12B / 27B)
Google DeepMind
Gemma Terms of Use
Custom Open Weights
Conditional

Multimodal open weights. Google acceptable-use policy restricts harmful content, competitive distillation, and misrepresentation.

No user limit Private Restricted
Mistral NeMo / 7B v0.3
Mistral AI
Apache 2.0
Permissive License
Full Commercial

Permissive Apache 2.0. Note that Mistral Large uses proprietary licensing.

No user limit Private Allowed
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 (Flash / Pro)
Xiaomi AI
Apache 2.0
Permissive License
Full Commercial

Apache 2.0. MoE omnimodal models (text, image, video, audio). Full commercial use permitted.

No user limit Private Allowed
Phi-4 (14B)
Microsoft
MIT License
Permissive License
Full Commercial

Standard MIT open software license.

No user limit Private Allowed

1. What True Open Source AI Actually Means (The OSI Definition)

According to the Open Source Initiative (OSI), true Open Source AI requires full transparency across the entire machine learning pipeline: source code, training datasets, data preprocessing scripts, and training hyperparameters. Merely releasing model weights does not qualify as open source.

2. Open Weights: Why Llama, Mistral & Qwen Are Not Strictly Open Source

Models like Meta Llama 3, Mistral Commercial, and certain frontier releases are Open Weights, not open source. The model weights are publicly downloadable, but training data remains proprietary and usage is governed by bespoke license agreements with legal restrictions.

3. Commercial Usage Caps & The 700M Active User Rule

The Meta Llama 3 Community License requires companies with more than 700 million monthly active users to apply for a separate commercial license from Meta. While irrelevant for startups, this is a critical consideration for enterprise compliance and future-proofing.

4. The Synthetic Data Distillation Trap

Most proprietary and open-weight licenses (including Llama 3) explicitly prohibit using model outputs to train or improve competing language models. If you plan to distill a large model into a smaller task-specific model, verify whether your model license permits synthetic data training (e.g. Apache 2.0 models like OLMo or MIT models like DeepSeek).

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Llama 3 is an open-weights model published under the Meta Llama 3 Community License. Because it imposes commercial user thresholds (700M MAU) and restricts using outputs to train other models, it does not conform to the OSI Open Source definition.

DeepSeek models (V3, R1) are released under the highly permissive MIT License. Allen AI OLMo is licensed under Apache 2.0 with open datasets. Falcon models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Under Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses, yes, without restriction. Under Llama 3 Community License, yes, provided your company does not exceed 700M monthly active users across all products and adheres to acceptable use policies.

You cannot legally use that model's outputs to fine-tune or pretrain a competing foundation model. Violating this clause can invalidate your commercial rights and expose your company to intellectual property disputes.

OSI-approved licenses (like Apache 2.0 or MIT) have decades of established case law and predictable legal precedent. Custom community licenses introduce novel ambiguity around derivative works and liability.

Compare model licenses and sizing

Check hardware requirements and licensing details for hundreds of models in our VRAM Calculator.

Open VRAM Calculator

Knowledge & Deep Dives

Local LLM & VRAM Knowledge Hub

In-depth guides, architectural breakdowns, and hardware sizing manuals to help you build, run, and scale offline AI models with zero guesswork.

50+ Terms8 min reference
Master technical terminology: GGUF vs. Safetensors, K-quants, KV cache, GQA, MoE total vs. active parameters, and Apple unified memory.
Interactive search and category filtering
Practical hardware takeaways for every term
Comprehensive definitions with zero jargon
Alphabetical quick reference index
Read Guide
Interactive Tool6 min read
Understand why context length causes sudden CUDA Out of Memory errors, the exact mathematical formula, and how to reduce memory by 50% to 75%.
Interactive context memory calculator
MHA vs. GQA vs. DeepSeek MLA architectures
FP8 and INT4 cache quantization savings
Multi-turn conversation memory overhead
Read Guide
Config Decoder7 min read
Inspect Hugging Face repositories like a machine learning engineer: decode config.json, spot real context limits, and avoid the MoE parameter trap.
Interactive config.json parameter inspector
GGUF quantization naming conventions decoded
MoE total vs. active parameter memory rules
Context window and RoPE scaling parameters
Read Guide
Hardware Guide8 min read
Learn why memory bandwidth dictates generation speed, how to pick between Apple Silicon and Nvidia, and the exact VRAM needed for 8B to 70B models.
VRAM capacity tiers (8GB to 128GB+)
Memory bandwidth vs. compute formula
Apple Silicon Mac vs. Nvidia PC comparison
Dual-GPU 70B workstation build blueprints
Read Guide